Service Virtualization, Development Testing, API Testing Tips

Why Regression Testing is a Development Testing Lifesaver

Posted on Oct 9, 2013 11:48:00 AM

by Parasoft Marketing

Find me on:
    

By Rich Newman, Principal Software Engineer at Parasoft

regression testingLately, I've been working to implement more and better support in Insure++ (Parasoft's memory error detection tool) for the new C++11 standard -- not easy to do since every compiler out there has its own interpretation of the standard.  The process actually started some time back when C++11 was called C++0x and it wasn't clear when it would be finalized and published.  That was when Dustin, a member of my team, created our C++11 test suite using sample code and individual proposals from the C++ Working Group.  At that time we only needed to support GCC 4.4, so Dustin locked down the test suite to execute only against GCC 4.4 and only run the C++11 tests that correspond to the things GCC 4.4 supports.

In addition to Dustin's test suite, our nightly process includes hundreds of thousands of test cases (accounting for variations in compiler and operating system), each of which represents a customer-reported issue, a Parasoft-discovered issue, or -- more commonly -- a feature that may or may not have been implemented yet.

After spending several days integrating the new parser, analyzer, and instrumentation engine, the code was compiling, and it was time to run tests.  Thankfully, Dustin's hard work was about to pay off in the extreme.  I was easily able to unlock the C++11 test suite so that it ran all C++11 feature tests against all GCC compilers 4.4 and greater (none of the GCC compilers prior to 4.4 have support for C++11).  To my great disappointment, most of the test cases failed.  Even the ones which had previously been failing were now failing differently.  When I examined the test case logs, however, I was quite amused.

C++11 added, among other things, a new keyword: "constexpr". Any C++function which is declared "constexpr" must be fully resolvable at compile time. It must consist of only a return statement, and that return statement can only contain other "constexpr" entities. Instrumenting such a function is neither necessary, nor desirable. Nearly all of the C++11 test cases were failing because Insure++ hadn't yet been configured to handle "constexpr". It just saw a function and instrumented it normally. The resulting code is not compilable. 

After looking closely at the changes introduced into the parse tree, I found the relevant flag which determines whether or not a particular function has been declared as "constexpr". I then configured Insure++ to handle such functions appropriately. After that, most of the C++11 test cases ran correctly, even those which were previously failing.

That suite of regression tests was both a lifesaver and a timesaver.  I will never understand the development teams who claim they have no time to write and automated tests, but I will remain grateful that I work for a company that truly understands their benefit.

 

***

Want to read more about Parasoft's experiences with regression testing? Read our blog on Unit Testing: How We Eased the Burden of Our Regression Test Process.

Topics: Development Testing

Subscribe to Email Updates

API Integrity: Gartner Research

APITestingGartner

Read new Gartner API Testing researchlearn why success in the "API economy" requires a new approach to quality, business impacts of API failures & recommendations for service/API testing.

Follow Me